Home About Us State Farm Bureaus AG Links Order Material
American Farm Bureau Foundation for Agriculture
American Agricultural Insurance Company
American Farm Bureau Insurance Services
American Farm Bureau Inc
Farm Bureau Bank




Between a Rock and a Hard Place

06/29/08

Permalink 12:15:42 pm, by Justin Ellis   English (US)
Categories: Partners in Agriculture

Between a Rock and a Hard Place

"Hi, I'm from the government and I'm here to help you." This is not what a rancher 130 miles north of me wanted to hear two weeks ago. On June 17, two of his cows tested positive for brucellosis. This is a disease that causes abortion in cattle, elk and bison. To keep Wyoming's brucellosis-free status, in addition to the two positive reactors, the ranchers entire cattle herd has to be depopulated. The neighboring ranches to any of his cattle must also be bled and tested to prove their herds are free of brucellosis. Not an easy task considering that in June the cattle were turned out onto summer pastures that are measured in size by the section not just an acre. If Wyoming does lose it's brucellosis-free classification, all cattle that have reached puberty and are reproductively intact, have to be tested and have a negative result for any travel out of state.

State law requires us to vaccinate for this disease, but it still doesn't guarantee 100% resistance to it. Federal and state officials have worked decades to control the spread of this disease within the Greater Yellowstone National Park area.

So when it comes to animal I.D., I am willing to implement it if it will decrease animal disease and trace back to the source. But in this case the source is elk, owned by the state and living in the national forests owned by the government which would not be included in any animal I.D. system. So I advocate that we vaccinate and I.D. the elk and bison owned by the government-probably not a feasible idea, but a great show to watch!

When it comes to implementing a national I.D. system, it is beneficial as a producer, to be involved in the rule-making process so that the final rule works for us and not as a hindrance. The results should be solutions rather than just bureaucratic regulations. This would ensure a product for the consumer that is the safest possible and boosts consumer confidence.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Henwhisperer [Visitor] · http://nonais.org
So you think that killing an entire herd is ok? I think it is shameful and sinful. It is a waste, waste, waste. Disease is. Period. It's going to happen. Why not breed for resistance? NAIS isn't going to help stop disease. Tell me how you think it will. Educate yourself.
06/29/08 @ 17:30

Comment from: Chris [Visitor]
Justin was pointing out the important role animal id could play in tracing animals back to sources of contamination. Animal ID would expedite the process of finding possible contamination in livestock and will quicken response time. Justin didn't say NAIS would stop disease, he said it could decrease the spread of disease.
06/30/08 @ 13:30

Comment from: Troy Hadrick [Visitor]
You are exactly right Justin. An animal ID program could very well save our industry some day. Identifying the source of the disease would be crucial in saving thousands of farm animals from suffering a horrible fate. If henwhisperer wants to see waste, imagine the wholesale destruction of thousands of healthy animals in an attempt to contain a disease.
07/01/08 @ 17:32

Comment from: Justin Ellis [Member]
It looks a if I need to clarify and share what is currently happening on this issue. According to today's paper, at least another 13 cattle have tested positive for brucellosis from the same herd. Wyoming Assistant State Vet Jim Logan said that "the owner has not yet decided what he is going to do: depopulate his herd or enter into a long-term test-and-slaughter program under quarantine.

Federal animal officials prefer that animals be depopulated, but such an action is voluntary. If the herd is not depopulated, Wyoming will lose its brucellosis free market status. Because the majority of the neighboring ranches have turned their cattle out for the summer, they will be tested in the fall and will not be able to sell any animals until tested.

I don't think I said that was OK to kill these animals, but may be necessary to contain this disease that is highly transmittable among elk to cattle. This disease can also be transmitted to humans and is called undulant fever. Before pasteurization, the source was drinking raw milk from an infected cow. This is why containing such an infectious disease is critical and wouldn't it be pretty important to know where an infected animal is through a trace back system before a disease could continue to spread. Also, cattle can NOT be bred for resistance to this bacterial disease but must be vaccinated for it. We just need a vaccine that is guaranteed 100% effective. It's all about the health and safety for the animal and the people.
07/02/08 @ 01:36

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.