close [X]

Update: Not #CleanWaterClearRules

WOTUS In Effect in 18 States

Market Intel / August 17, 2018

Credit: iStockPhoto 

Update:

As of Tuesday, September 18, four more states have been added to the list of states exempt from the 2015 Waters of the U.S. regulation. These states are Texas, Louisiana, Iowa and Mississippi. Several states have requested a court order to temporarily block WOTUS. 

Following a federal judge’s ruling in South Carolina, a nationwide injunction was issued on an Environmental Protection Agency rule that delayed the implementation of the 2015 Waters of the United States rule. As a result, 26 states are now required to follow the WOTUS rule, which redefines and significantly expands which wetlands and small waterways are covered by the Clean Water Act. 

In these states, the federal government has regulatory control over virtually any waters – and many land areas that only temporarily hold water. Few, if any, waters are expected to fall out of the scope of jurisdiction in these 26 states.

As a result, farmers in these states will be subject to overbroad, vague and illegal regulations on cropland and ranchland. These regulations will increase business uncertainty and farming costs. They also threaten farm profitability on existing ground and will likely prevent new agricultural activity on cropland or ranchland that potentially falls under the WOTUS jurisdiction.

The delay rule was designed to provide clarity and maintain regulatory certainty and stability while the administration reconsiders the 2015 WOTUS rule and develops new regulations to provide both clean water and clear rules. 

For more information on American Farm Bureau Federation's efforts on the WOTUS rule visit: Clean Water Act, WOTUS.

Contact:
John Newton, Ph.D.
Chief Economist
(202) 406-3729
jnewton@fb.org
twitter.com/@New10_AgEcon
 

Share This Article

The share of household income spent on food is an indicator of national wellness and food security. In 1857, economist Ernst Engel posited that as incomes rise, households tend to spend a smaller percentage of their total income on food -- both at home and away from home. At the same time though, the total amount spent on food increases. Engel’s Law remains a consistent framework for looking at the broader implications of food expenditures and can be seen in the research and data coming from USDA and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Full Article
Credit: Sgt. Mikki Sprenkle/Public Domain 

Following nearly two years of unfair retaliatory tariffs that have roiled U.S. commodity markets and disrupted supply chains, USDA recently signaled that the second of three rounds of Market Facilitation Program payments, i.e., payments that were tentatively to be paid in November 2019, will be available to producers in late November or early December. The first round of trade assistance, announced in July 2019, authorized up to $14.5 billion in direct payments to farmers who had been impacted by the tariffs (USDA Announces Details Behind the New Trade Aid Package). USDA data suggests that, so far, the department has sent $6.8 billion in payments to farmers.

Full Article