The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers finalized a rule, effective August 2015, that significantly expanding the definition of “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. EPA not only failed to listen to concerned farmers, ranchers and business owners around the country in crafting its new rule, but actually managed to make the final rule worse than anticipated. The agency is making it impossible for farmers and ranchers to look at their land and know what can be regulated. EPA has vastly expanded its authority beyond the limits approved by Congress and affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court. Farm Bureau supports the recent executive action to withdraw the rule and replace it with a new rule that ensures farmers and ranchers can continue to farm while still protecting the land and water features in and around their farms.
The WOTUS rule grants regulatory control over virtually all waters, assuming a scope of authority Congress has not authorized. The rule effectively eliminates any constraints the term “navigable” previously imposed on the Corps’ and EPA’s CWA jurisdiction, and the list of waters deemed “non-navigable” is exceptionally narrow--providing that few, if any waters, would fall outside federal control. This kind of shift in policy means that EPA and the Corps can regulate any or all waters found within a state, no matter how small or seemingly unconnected to a federal interest.
The final rule provides none of the clarity and certainty it promises. Instead, it creates confusion and risk by giving the agencies almost unlimited authority to regulate, at their discretion, any low spot where rainwater collects, including common farm ditches, ephemeral drainages, agricultural ponds and isolated wetlands found in and near farms and ranches across the nation. The rule defines terms like “tributary” and “adjacent” in ways that make it impossible for farmers and ranchers to know whether the specific ditches, ephemeral drains or low areas on their land will be deemed “waters of the U.S.” But these definitions are broad enough to give regulators (and citizen plaintiffs) plenty of room to assert that such areas are subject to CWA regulation. The rule will give the agencies sweeping new authority to regulate land use, which they may exercise at will, or at the whim of a citizen plaintiff.
- Farm Bureau has significant concerns with the 2015 rule and believes it expands federal jurisdiction, resulting in the imposition of burdensome requirements on agricultural producers.
- Farm Bureau supports the EPA’s and Corps’ effort to withdraw the 2015 rule and replace it with a rule that conforms to the limits approved by Congress and affirmed by the Supreme Court.
- Farm Bureau supports congressional efforts to have EPA and the Corps withdraw the rule and limit funding for implementation.
April 21, 2014
The Public’s view on new rule
EPA and the Corps published for public comment a proposed rule defining the scope of waters protected under the CWA. According to EPA, this proposal would enhance protection for the nation's public health and aquatic resources, and increase CWA program predictability and consistency by increasing clarity as to the scope of “Waters of the United States” protected under the act.
April 28, 2014
It’s time to Ditch the Rule!
AFBF launched the #DitchtheRule microsite to provide key information on the WOTUS rule, its impact to farmers around the country and links to take action and submit comments to EPA and Congress
August 28, 2015
The WOTUS rule takes effect
The final EPA and Corps rule defining the scope of waters protected under the CWA went into effect. Litigation challenging the rule is ongoing and will be for years to come. Various federal courts have stayed the rule, but the rule is ultimately final.
December 14, 2015
GAO finds EPA violated law on WOTUS
The GAO found that the Environmental Protection Agency broke the law with its social media and grassroots lobbying campaign advocating for its own Waters of the U.S. rule. It has become clear that the agency used illegal tactics to manufacture ill-informed support for the rule.
February 28, 2017
President Trump issues executive order to withdraw WOTUS rule
Recognizing the legal flaws and agency overreach embodied in the 2015 rule, President Trump and EPA Administrator Pruitt announced their intent to withdraw the 2015 rule and replace it with a lawful rule that respects the cooperative federalism basis of the CWA. Farm Bureau supports this administrative action and intends to file comments in support of a new rule to ensure that farmers and ranchers can continue to farm while still protecting the land and water features in and around their farms.