Restaurant Performance Index Increases; Expectations Remain Strong

Market Intel / January 3, 2018

Credit: Mack Male//CC By 2.0 

The restaurant industry accounts for $799 billion in sales, according to the National Restaurant Association.  It’s an important piece of the food business, debuting food trends, shaping how we eat and employing 14.7 million people.  The restaurant industry is also highly cyclical and exposed to the economic winds of the overall economy.  To capture restaurant owner sentiment, the National Restaurant Association surveys owners on a monthly basis, asking them to evaluate the current situation of the restaurant industry and what the expectations are for the next six months. That data is released as an index value in what is known as the Restaurant Performance Index.

The most recent data, released at the end of December, looked at November through the beginning of 2018. The overall index increased compared to the previous month to 101.1.  A value of 100 is recognized as a stable state of the industry—neither expansion nor contraction.  Values above 100 indicate expansion, while values below 100 indicate contraction. November marks the 15th consecutive month the index has been over 100.

The index is divided into two categories: the current situation and the expectations index.  This is designed to indicate strength or weakness in specific areas such as same-store sales, capital expenditures, labor, and customer traffic.  In November, the current situation also improved, showing stronger same-store sales, customer traffic and labor.  However, the current index value was still slightly below the 100 mark, indicating some current weakness.  In an interesting contrast, a separate National Restaurant Association survey showed that in 2017 one in 10 adults planned on eating Thanksgiving at a restaurant.

On the expectations side of the index, restaurant owners are expecting the next six months to continue to improve.  The November expectations index is the highest it has been in nine months.  Business conditions were expected to gain the most ground, up 0.8 percent from last month, followed by same-store sales.  Capital expenditures declined relative to a month ago, but still posted a value over 100.

In the last three months the gap between the current situation and the expectations index has widened.  Expectations indicate strong growth in the future, but the current situation indicates that the last several months of positive expectations have yet to come to fruition.  Capital expenditures declined relative to October in both the current and expectations index, which are longer term investments and could point to hesitation to commit to large upgrades, although both values were still at 100 or above.  For the full report visit National Restaurant Association.

Katelyn McCullock
(202) 406-3600

Share This Article

Credit: U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration / CC0 

For the first time since the 2011/12 crop year, U.S. soybean exports are projected to decline from prior-year levels. USDA’s March 2018 World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates projects soybean exports in 2017/18 at 2.065 billion bushels, down 109 million bushels, or 5 percent, from prior marketing-year levels. One bushel of soybeans yields 47.5 pounds of soybean meal and 10.7 pounds of soybean oil. After converting U.S. soybean meal and soybean oil exports to their soybean equivalents, total U.S. soybean-equivalent exports are projected at 2.764 billion bushels, down 136 million bushels from the prior marketing year’s record-high export volume of 2.9 billion bushels.

Full Article
Credit: hurdiantonia0 / CC0  

When agricultural disasters occur, the federal government has traditionally responded in one of two ways: ad-hoc disaster payments or assistance in purchasing federal crop insurance. For nearly two decades the preferred delivery mechanism for a majority of agricultural products has been the federal crop insurance program. Ad-hoc payments do still occur, especially for commodities not widely covered by crop insurance. Such was the case in 2018 following devastating hurricanes, droughts, floods and wildfires across parts of the U.S. in 2017. However, as work on the 2018 farm bill ramps up, it’s appropriate to review the benefits of federal crop insurance programs compared to ad-hoc disaster payments. Today’s article compares the farm safety net protection provided by crop insurance to ad-hoc disaster payments, and reveals a negative correlation between the need for ad-hoc disaster assistance and the use of crop insurance tools.

Full Article