close [X]

H-2A and the AEWR We Were

Market Intel / March 15, 2019

Credit: U.S. Department of Agriculture / CC0 

Recently released data for H-2A positions certified during the first quarter of 2019 seem to indicate that the large increases in H-2A wages are starting to take a toll. In the first quarter of 2019, the number of positions certified was up 10 percent compared to the first quarter of 2018, representing the slowest first quarter increase in three years. 

The H-2A "adverse effect wage rate," or AEWR, is the regional weighted average hourly wage rate for field and livestock workers combined, as measured by USDA’s annual Farm Labor Survey of non-supervisory farm and ranch workers. Employers utilizing the H-2A program must pay employees the higher of the following: federal or state minimum wage; the "prevailing wage" as determined by the Department of Labor using a special H-2A methodology to conduct wage surveys for each particular task in very local areas; or the AEWR.

In Table 1 we compare the applicable 2019 minimum wage in each state to the 2019 AEWR. A quick scan of the table reveals that the AEWR rate is higher than the prevailing minimum wage in every state. As a result, the AEWR wage rate is what H-2A employers are paying in 2019.

2019 AEWR and Minimum Wage by State
State Minimum Wage AEWR
Alabama $7.25  $11.13 
Arizona $11.00 $12.00
Arkansas $9.25 $11.33
California $12.00 $13.92
Colorado $11.10 $13.13
Connecticut $10.10 $13.25
Delaware $8.75 $13.15
Florida $8.46 $11.24
Georgia $7.25 $11.13
Hawaii $10.10 $14.73
Idaho $7.25 $13.48
Illinois $8.25 $13.26
Indiana $7.25 $13.26
Iowa $7.25 $13.34
Kansas $7.25 $14.38
Kentucky $7.25 $11.63
Louisiana $7.25 $11.33
Maine $11.00 $13.25
Maryland $10.10 $13.15
Massachusetts $12.00 $13.25
Michigan $9.25 $13.54
Minnesota $9.86 $13.54
Mississippi $7.25 $11.33
Missouri $8.60 $13.34
Montana $8.50 $13.48
Nebraska $9.00 $14.38
Nevada $8.25 $13.13
New Hampshire $7.25 $13.25
New Jersey $8.85 $13.15
New Mexico $7.50 $12.00
New York $11.10 $13.25
North Carolina $7.25 $12.25
North Dakota $7.25 $14.38
Ohio $8.55 $13.26
Oklahoma $7.25 $12.23
Oregon $10.75 $15.03
Pennsylvania $7.25 $13.15
Rhode Island $10.50 $13.25
South Carolina $7.25 $11.13
South Dakota $9.10 $14.38
Tennessee $7.25 $11.63
Texas $7.25 $12.23
Utah $7.25 $13.13
Vermont $10.78 $13.25
Virginia $7.25 $12.25
Washington $12.00 $15.03
West Virginia $8.75 $11.63
Wisconsin $7.25 $13.54
Wyoming $7.25 $13.48

The national average AEWR wage in 2019 is $12.96, up 6 percent from 2018. To put the 6 percent in context, the U.S. increase in average hourly earnings in  calendar year 2018 was 3.1 percent.

In eight states in the west -- Colorado, Nevada, Utah, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Arizona and New Mexico -- the 2019 AEWR wage rose by double-digits since 2018, with increases ranging from 15-23 percent. Only three states saw a decline in the AEWR – Missouri, Iowa and Florida. The rest grew between 2-9 percent.

The increase in the AEWR in 2019 follows a long trend of rising rates. Since 2012, the national average AEWR has climbed 25 percent, from $10.39 to $12.96. Meanwhile, the total number of certified positions has continued to grow as well. In fiscal year2012, 85,248 position were certified.  By FY 2018 the number of positions had grown to 242,762, as seen in figure 2.

On a state level, the Pacific coast states have experienced the highest increases, with Oregon and Washington posting the highest rate of growth – 38 percent – since 2012. With a 36 percent increase in the AEWR since 2012, California is not far behind. The two states with the lowest increases, Missouri and Iowa, still experienced significant growth — 16 percent – since 2012.

Though growth in first quarter 2019 was the slowest for the first quarter in the last three years, data shows that interest in the H2-A program continues to be strong. Industry analysts will closely watch to see whether slower growth in Q1 of 2019 will become a trend. 

Veronica Nigh
(202) 406-3622

Share This Article

Credit: Mauricio Lima / CC BY 2.0  

According to USDA’s “A Case for Rural Broadband,” if access to broadband and adoption of digital agricultural technologies matched producer demand, U.S. agriculture would realize benefits amounting to nearly 18% of total U.S. market production, or $64.5 billion annually, based on 2017 levels. The report, published by the American Broadband Initiative, analyzes the possible economic benefits of bringing e-connectivity to the heartland and, more importantly, what needs to be done to make it happen.

Full Article
Credit: U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration / CC0 

In response to U.S. tariffs on imported solar panels, washing machines, steel and aluminum, as well as additional products from China, e.g., Tariff Revenues Up Sharply, many of our largest trading partners responded by retaliating on U.S. agriculture products including but not limited to tobacco, soybeans, dairy products, feed grains, pork, fruits and tree nuts. These retaliatory actions included the cancellation of supply contracts, higher tariffs and other non-tariff barriers. Many U.S. farmers lost access to foreign markets, resulting in increased inventories of some U.S.-produced commodities in 2018.

Full Article