Impact of COVID-19 on Agriculture

July Cattle on Feed Report in Line with Expectations

Market Intel / July 19, 2019

Credit: U.S. Department of Agriculture / CC BY 2.0 

The Cattle on Feed report provides monthly estimates of the number of cattle being fed for slaughter. For the report, USDA surveys feedlots of 1,000 head or more, as this represents 85% of all fed cattle. Cattle feeders provide data on inventory, placements, marketings and other disappearance.

The report showed a total inventory of 11.485 million head for the United States on June 1. This increase of 1.8% is in line with expectations, as industry analysts’ predictions showed an average year-over-year increase in feedlot inventories of 1.8%. 

Expand Image

While total inventories are an important component of the report, other key factors include placements (new animals being placed on feed) and marketings (animals being taken off feed and sold for slaughter). June placements typically tend to drop following a higher batch of placements for May. This June, analysts predicted an average 2.1% decrease from the 2018 number, which was actually a large placement number for June relative to history. This expectation was largely driven by lower Agricultural Marketing Services-reported feeder cattle sales, which may be a result of historically good pasture and range conditions combined with higher feeding costs, which incentivizes keeping the animals on pasture longer and placing at higher weights. However, there was some uncertainty in analysts’ expectations for the placement number, resulting in a very large range of a 6.8% decrease to a 5.7% increase. Placements in June totaled 1.756 million head, which is 2.3% below 2018 levels, in line with the average of industry forecasts. We did see heavier placement weights versus a year ago, which is in line with better pasture conditions. Marketings in May were 1.945 million head, down exactly 3% from a year ago and in line with the average analyst expectation of a decrease of 3%. 

Expand Image

Contact:
Michael Nepveux
Economist
(202) 406-3623
michaeln@fb.org
twitter.com/@NepveuxMichael
 

Share This Article

Credit: iStockPhoto 

Yesterday morning, we posted an article, Farmers’ Use of Paycheck Protection Loan Depends on ‘Small Business’ Definition, questioning whether the Small Business Administration’s industry-level standards pertaining to revenues would be enforced, ultimately excluding thousands of agricultural producers from getting Paycheck Protection Program Loans. Yesterday evening, SBA released the Paycheck Protection Program interim final rule. After corroborating our interpretation with SBA, we are pleased to confirm that the IFR removes the industry-specific revenue thresholds. Agriculture enterprises that employ 500 or less people whose principal place of residence is in the United States are eligible, regardless of revenue levels.

Full Article
Credit: Erich Ferdinand 

Last week we released a Market Intel, What’s in the CARES Act for Food and Agriculture, outlining the provisions of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, Economic Security Act specifically intended for agriculture. This Market Intel delves into provisions of the CARES Act that, depending on how some provisions are interpreted by the Small Business Administration, could potentially provide a lifeline for ag producers. There are three main SBA programs that are of the most interest to agricultural producers: The Paycheck Protection Program Loan (PPPL), Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) and the Emergency EIDL grants.

Full Article