Impact of COVID-19 on Agriculture

Durum Wheat Tariff Profile

Market Intel / August 24, 2018

We continue our Market Intel series on commodity-specific tariff profiles with wheat.

The U.S. maintains a net trade balance on wheat of over $5.3 billion. As the second-largest exporter of wheat, the U.S. exported $6 billion in wheat and imported $687 million worth of the commodity in 2017. The U.S. charges a 0 percent tariff to all free trade agreement partners and charges a $0.65/kg tariff for all non-free trade agreement partners in the World Trade Organization.

China employs tariff-rate quotas for durum wheat. At the current rate, China charges a 1 percent tariff on a limited quantity of wheat coming into the country, after the quota is met, all other wheat imports are charged a 65 percent tariff. However, with the retaliatory tariffs in place right now, the U.S. is charged 26 percent for wheat imports that are in quota, and 90 percent for wheat imports that are out of quota.

In 2017, the U.S. exported $855 million in wheat to Mexico, our largest customer. With the North American Free Trade Agreement in place, the $855 million to Mexico and $17 million to Canada was charged a 0 percent tariff. Our competitors, on the other hand, are subject to a 24.5 percent tariff on wheat to Canada and a 15 percent tariff to Mexico.

Like NAFTA, the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement, ensures that the $328 million in U.S. wheat purchased by South Korea in 2017 was charged a 3 percent tariff instead of the standard 9 percent tariff. The second-largest customer of U.S. wheat is Japan, charging a 0 percent tariff and purchasing $713 million worth of wheat in 2017. Figure 1 highlights these points and more.

The previous installment of our Market Intel series on commodity-specific tariff profiles included an overview on tariffs and a deep-dive into soybean tariffs.  

Contact:
Megan Nelson
Economic Analyst
(202) 406-3629
megann@fb.org
twitter.com/@MeganRNelson1
 
Veronica Nigh
Economist
(202) 406-3622
veronican@fb.org
 

Share This Article

Credit: Pixabay 

First incorporated into a farm bill in 1985, the conservation title is what some would consider the original Green New Deal. Its voluntary conservation initiatives give farmers and ranchers flexibility to adopt practices in a market-based approach. Farmers and ranchers are already good stewards of water and land, but the 2018 farm bill, the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, provided expanded conservation programs that could increase conservation initiatives. The goal is to improve water quality and wildlife habitats and populations, protecting natural resources and providing many other benefits. The conservation title of the 2018 farm bill spends $60 billion of the $867 billion of mandatory funding required for conservation programs over 10 years, equal to 7% of the bill’s total projected mandatory spending in that timeframe.

Full Article
Credit: iStockPhoto 

AFBF’s Market Intel is publishing a five-part series to highlight the opportunities, challenges, policy levers and overall operation of agriculture ecosystem credit markets. This Market Intel article, the last in the series, looks at the development of good business practices for agriculture ecosystem credit markets and assesses the markets’ long-term impacts.

Full Article