close [X]

Apple Tariff Profile

Market Intel / October 11, 2018

With apple season upon us, our Market Intel series on commodity-specific tariff profiles continues with this fall favorite.

As the third-largest producer of apples in the world, the U.S. exported $969 million worth of apples in 2017. By importing $233 million in the same year, the U.S. maintained a trade surplus of $736 million in apples in 2017. On its apple imports, the U.S. charges a 0 percent tariff for all FTA partners, like Mexico and Canada. For non-FTA partners, the U.S. charges a tariff of 1.1 cents per kilogram.

In 2017, purchasing $18.3 million in U.S. apples, China represents our 11th-largest customer. The tariff on U.S. apples in China is 10 percent. However, with retaliatory tariffs in place, the tariff on U.S. apples has increased to 60 percent. All the while, our competitors are still subject to a 10 percent tariff.

Our North American Free Trade Agreement partners, Mexico and Canada consume the most U.S. apples. Mexico is the largest importer of U.S. apples, purchasing $275 million in 2017. Our second-largest customer, Canada, purchased $167 million worth of U.S. apples in 2017. Due to NAFTA, the U.S. apple exporters are subject to a 0 percent tariff on all apples to both Mexico and Canada. Without NAFTA, the same exporters would be subject to a 20 percent tariff in Mexico, and a 4.3 percent tariff in Canada.

Importing 4.1 percent of the world’s apples, India is the third-largest customer for U.S. apples. In 2017, India purchased $97 million worth of U.S. apples. The tariff India charges on fresh apples is 50 percent, however as of September 18, 2018, the tariff on U.S. apples increased to 75 percent, in retaliation for U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs. India’s average most favored nation tariff rate for agricultural products is 32.7 percent.

To read more in the series, check out our deep-dive into soybean, wheat, corn, pork, cotton, beef, shelled almond and sweet cherry tariffs.

Contact:
Megan Nelson
Economic Analyst
(202) 406-3629
megann@fb.org
twitter.com/@MeganRNelson1
 

Share This Article

Credit: Edbrown05~commonswiki / CC0 

On July 26, the Department of Labor published a proposed rule that would amend its regulations regarding certain provisions of the H-2A program. Among the many changes in the proposed rule are revisions to the methodologies used to determine the Adverse Effect Wage Rate. Rather than a single AEWR for all H-2A workers within a region, DOL has proposed AEWRs by agricultural occupation. The proposal reflects the department's concern that the current AEWR methodology for field and livestock workers (combined) may have an adverse effect on the wages of workers in higher-paid agricultural occupations, such as farmworker supervisors and construction laborers on farms. Following the data supplied by DOL in the proposed rule, this Market Intel will look at what the proposal means for farms utilizing the H-2A program.

Full Article
Credit: CC BY 2.0 

While on the higher side of pre-report estimates, the USDA September Crop Production report shows corn and soybeans yields are down from 2018 and lower than the projections posted in the USDA August Crop Production report.

Full Article