Impact of COVID-19 on Agriculture

Shelled Almond Tariff Profile

Market Intel / September 27, 2018

Our Market Intel series on commodity-specific tariff profiles continues with almonds.

In 2017, the U.S. maintained a trade surplus of over $3 billion in shelled almonds. This surplus is sustained by exporting $3.3 billion in shelled almonds and importing only $59.7 million in 2017. The U.S. produces 80 percent of the world’s shelled almonds and exports 88 percent of the world’s shelled almonds.  For all free trade agreement partners, the U.S. tariff on shelled almonds is 0 percent. For non-FTA partners, the U.S. tariff is 24 cents per kilogram.

The European Union imports 41 percent of the world’s shelled almonds and is our largest customer, purchasing $1.5 billion worth of U.S. shelled almonds in 2017. The EU charges a 1.75 percent tariff on their large market share of shelled almonds.

Our seventh-largest customer, South Korea, purchased $167 million worth of U.S. shelled almonds in 2017. Due to the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement, U.S. shelled almonds are charged a 0 percent tariff, as opposed to our competitors, which are charged an 8 percent tariff.

The North American Free Trade Agreement guarantees that U.S. shelled almond exporters are charged a 0 percent tariff on almonds into Mexico and Canada. Canada is our fourth-largest customer, purchasing $187.7 million worth of U.S. shelled almonds in 2017. Mexico is the 15th-largest consumer of U.S. shelled almonds, purchasing $63.6 million in 2017. Without NAFTA, the U.S. would be subject to a 20 percent tariff on shelled almonds to Mexico.

The second-largest global importer of shelled almonds, China, purchased $74.8 million worth of U.S. shelled almonds in 2017. The tariff charged on U.S. shelled almonds is an average of 10 percent. However, with retaliatory tariffs in place, the current tariff on U.S. almonds is 60 percent, while our competitors are still charged 10 percent.

To read more in the series check out our deep-dive into soybean, wheat, corn, pork, cotton and beef tariffs.

Contact:
Megan Nelson
Economic Analyst
(202) 406-3629
megann@fb.org
twitter.com/@MeganRNelson1
 
Veronica Nigh
Economist
(202) 406-3622
veronican@fb.org
 

Share This Article

Credit: Pixabay 

First incorporated into a farm bill in 1985, the conservation title is what some would consider the original Green New Deal. Its voluntary conservation initiatives give farmers and ranchers flexibility to adopt practices in a market-based approach. Farmers and ranchers are already good stewards of water and land, but the 2018 farm bill, the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, provided expanded conservation programs that could increase conservation initiatives. The goal is to improve water quality and wildlife habitats and populations, protecting natural resources and providing many other benefits. The conservation title of the 2018 farm bill spends $60 billion of the $867 billion of mandatory funding required for conservation programs over 10 years, equal to 7% of the bill’s total projected mandatory spending in that timeframe.

Full Article
Credit: iStockPhoto 

AFBF’s Market Intel is publishing a five-part series to highlight the opportunities, challenges, policy levers and overall operation of agriculture ecosystem credit markets. This Market Intel article, the last in the series, looks at the development of good business practices for agriculture ecosystem credit markets and assesses the markets’ long-term impacts.

Full Article